COMPONENT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING
Suggested
Procedure
Ø Step
1. Forming Home Team
Course
members from groups of four, this is their home team
Ø Step
2. .Forming Expert Teams
Each
person leave their home team and forms a group of no more than four with people
from other foursomes who have the same letter.
Ø Step
3. Experts Teach Their Home Teams
People
return to their home teams.
Ø Step
4. Home Teams Create Lesson plan
To
develop an outline for one lesson plan which incorporates all the components of
cooperative learning
Ø Step
5. Presenting Lesson Plan Outlines
These
lesson plan outlines can be presented to the class.
Ø Step
6. Discussing Jigsaw
One
thing that is important to keep in mind is that Jigsaw I only works if each
piece of the text is understandable on its own.
Ø Step
7. Considering The Differences
Course
members consider how cooperative learning differs from traditional method.
Groups
that finish early can work on making their lesson plan outlines more detailed,
or they can work on another lesson plan outlint
Jigsaw
I
Ø Step
1 : Each home team member a different
piece of the reading material : Piece A,B,C,D.
Ø Step
2 : They form expert team to become experts on their own pieces.
Ø Step
3 : They return home and teach their piece to their home team
Ø Step
4 : Home teams combine the information from their experts with their other
knowledge to perform a task.
JIGSAW
PIECES FOR COMPONENTS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING
Section
A
Positive
Interdependence
Positive
interdependence is a feeling among a group of students that what help any
member of the group help everyone in the group, and what hurts any memberships
of the group hurts everyone in the group.
Section
B
Collaborative Skills
The
first time most teachers ask their students to study in group, it quickly
becomes clear that students lack the necessary skills to work effectively with
others.
Second,
students need a clear understanding of what the skill is.
Third,
students may need to practice the collaborative skill in isolation from regular
class content.
Fourth,
the skill should be integrated into course content activities.
Fifth,
processing group interaction is important.
Section
C
Processing Group
Interaction
Processing
Group Interaction has two aspects. One, the good things about group functioning
should be brought out. Two, the group should discuss what in their interaction
needs to be improved.
Section
D
Individual
Accountability
One
of the most commonly heard objections to having students work in groups in that
some group members will end up doing all the work and all the learning.
DEFINISIONS
OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING
To
help course members see that there is not jut one definition of cooperative
learning, rather that, as in many areas of education, different people use the
same term to mean different things and use different term to mean the same
thing.
Suggested procedure.
There are some steps :
Ø Reading
Ø Pairing
up to work an a task
Ø Creating
examples
Ø The
write step
Ø The
pair step
Ø The
share step
Ø Conclusion.
All cooperative
learning methods share the idea that students work together to learn and a
responsible for their teammates` learning as well as their own.
Kagan and Kagan
describe four principles which are key to the structural approach :
v Simultaneous
interaction
v Equal
participation
v Positive
interdependence
v individual
accountability
SIMILARITIES
BETWEEN GROUPS
IN
EDUCATION AND GROUPS AT WORK
Suggested Procedure
Ø Step
1. Preparing for the task
Ø Course
members form pairs and read the MURDER script in preparation for using that
script
Ø Step
2. Learning “Groups at Work”
Starting
with the first section, the pairs read groups at work one section at a time by
following the steps in the MURDER script.
Ø Step
3. Discussion Using
Inside-Outside
Circle
You
might want to ask all groups to stop when you see that a couple of groups have
finished.
Ø Step
4. Inside-Outside Circle, First Round
The
people facing each other discuss the similarities and differences between
groupsat work and in education which
they thought of as they read and
discussed with their partner.
Ø Step
5. Inside-Outside Circle, second Round
The
people in the Outside Circle rotate one position so that they are now facing a
different person in the Inside Circle.
Ø Step
6. Discussing Similarities and differences
The
whole class discusses the of similarities and differences of group education in
the work place.
Ø Step
7. Discussing MURDER
Discuss,
first in the groups and then as a whole class, How MURDER involves components
of cooperative learning and how it can be used with other text.
THE
MURDER SCRIPT
Murder Method’s script
v Setting
the proper Mood
v Understanding
a reading passage
v Recalling the material read
v Detecting
of errors – omission in summary
v Elaborating
the material more memorable. Step 2,3,4,5 are repeated.
v Reviewing
the entire passage by creating a super-summary
When
the pair has the finished all the sections of the text, they construct overall
summary of the entire text.
GROUP
AT WORK
THEORIES
UNDERLYING COOPERATIVE LEARNING
Suggested Procedure
Ø Step
1. Grouping and Reading
Ø Step
2. Working in Expert Teams
Ø Step
3. Teaching Members in the Home Teams
Ø Step
4. Discussion in Home Teams
Ø Step
5. Further Discussion in Home Teams
Ø Step
6. Whole Class Discussion
Ø Step
7. Discussion on Jigsaw II and Roundrobin
RoundRobin.
In
turn, each group member shares while the others listen
Ø Step
1 : A shares
Ø Step
2 : B shares
Ø Step
3 : C shares
Ø Step
4 : D shares
FONDATIONS
OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING
Foundations involve philosophies and theories as the basic deriving
methods of cooperative learning
Overview
Ø Dewey’s
Philosophy
Ø Behaviorist
Philosophy
Ø Social
Philosophy
Ø Cognitive
Philosophy
Dewey’s
central ideas/principles
v Students
should be active, learning by doing
v Intrinsic
motivation
v Knowledge
is changing
v Learning
should relate to students’ needs and interests.
v Learning
should include learning to work with, respect, understand others.
v Learning
should be contextualized.
Procedures of G-I
Ø Step
1 : providing the topic that will be discussed
Ø Step
2 : choosing the topic that are provided by teacher.
Ø Step
3 : deciding the heterogeneous groups.
Ø Step
4 : planning their investigation, method, tasks, and goal of chosen topic.
Ø Step
5 : conducting investigation
Ø Step
6 : planning for presentation
Ø Step
7 : carrying out presentation
Ø Step
8 : teachers and students evaluate presentation
and investigation result
Teachers
and students evaluate presentation and
investigation result
v Extrinsic
motivation
v Low
cognitive level tasks
v Everyone
does the same things
v Achievement
is the goal, to be measured by objective tests.
v Product
orientation
v Teachers
decide what is to be learned and give students the information they are to
learn.
OPTIONS IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING
-
Student – Centered
-
Intrinsic Motivation
-
Knowledge Contruction
-
Loose
|
-
Teacher – Centered
-
Extrinsic Motivation
-
Knowledge Transmission
-
Structured
|
Student – Centered --------- Learning
Teacher – Centered --------- Learning
Intrinsic vs Extrinsic --------- Motivation
Loose ----------- Structured
|
RESEARCH
FINDINGS ON COOPERATIVE LEARNING
The
Adventages of Cooperative Learning
Ø Achievement
Ø Self
Esteem ( self confidence )
Ø Linking
for School ( school sick )
Ø Intergroup
Relations ( relation among members of the group )
Ø Use
of Higher – Level Thinking
POSSIBLE
REASONS FOR THE RESULTS OF STUDIES OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING
A. Achievement
- More opportunity to participate (simultaneity
principle)
- More chances to give and receive help
- Increased motivation to succeeded
- Poor study strategies students have more
chances to witness modeling by more efficient strategies students.
- Anxiety is lowered (less isolated)
- Students are given more responsibility
- Success often breed success (nothing in vain)
B.
Self Esteem
- Higher achievement
- Praise from peers, not just teachers
- Improve interpersonal relations
C. Linking for the
school
-
There is greater Feeling of
belonging a member of agroupa than an isolated individual
- School
become more fun place
- School
become a place where more students succeeded
D. Intergroup
relationship
- Non- superficial contact between
people from groups
- People from different group in
society work together toward a common goal.
- Each person has chance to contribute
something significant to the others in their classroom group.
E. Use of Higher – Level Thinking
- Interacting with others encourages
people to restructure their thinking
- Disagreement, when handled
constructively, help clarify thinking and help cognitive restructuring.
PROS
AND CONS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING
1. Cooperative
Controversy
v Difference
between Cooperative Controversy and Traditional Debates
v Procedures
for Cooperative Controversy
Cooperative Controversy
ü Start
the debate assigned to one position
ü Later
they are assigned to the other position
ü To
reach a consensus at the end of the debate
Traditional Debates
ü People
start with one position
ü Stay
with that view for the entire de bate, even if they totally disagree with it.
ü To
defeat the other idea
2. One Teacher`s
Experiences with Cooperative Learning
Tao
Zuang, an English lecturer at Fujian Teacher University in China, recounts her
initial difficulties in implementing cooperative learning and her thought and
actions as she worked to overcome some difficulties in cooperative learning.
3. The use of Heterogeneous
Grouping Based on Past Achievement: A Controversy in Cooperative Learning
Parents,
teachers, students, fear that :
·
High achiever :
Waste time to tutor others, Feel bored
·
Low achiever :
not be able to keep up with faster groupmate
·
Feel frustrated
TYPES
OF POSITIVE INTERDEPENDENCE
The Sweet Smell of
Learning: Adding Lots of Honey to Small Group Activities
Five Key Elements
v Positive
interdependence
v Individual
accountability
v Face-to-face
interaction
v Teaching
collaborative skills
v Processing
group interaction
Interdependence
It concerns people’s
perception of how they affect and are affected by what happens to others.
Interdependence
David Johnson : Learning
Together
Aronson : Jigsaw
Types
of Interdependence
Ø Positive
interdependence (collaborative environment)
Ø Negative
interdependence (competitive environment
TEACHING
COLLABORATIVE SKILLS
Six Key Elements Step :
Ø
Review of six-step procedure
Ø
Visualization Exercitive
Ø
Choosing a Collaborative Skills
Ø
Planning to Teach the Skills
Ø
Sharing Ideas Through One Stay, Two Stray
Ø
Discussing One Stay, Two Stray
LIST OF COLLABORATIVE SKILLS
Group Forming Skills
Ø
Getting into Groups Efficiently
Ø
Greeting Others
Ø
Introducing Oneself-Introducing Others
Ø
Using People`s Names When Speaking to Them
Ø
Ending a group Activity
Ø
Saying Goodbye
Basic Group Functioning Skills
Ø
Saying Thanks --- responding to Thanks
Ø
Attentive Listening
Ø
Giving Praise --- Responding to Praise
Ø
Waiting Patienly ---Trying Not to Keep Others Waiting
Ø
Asking for Help --- Giving Help
Ø
Appologizing ---Accepting Apologies
Ø
Encouraging Others to Participate --- Responding to Encouragement to
Participated
Ø
Asking Questions ---Responding to Questions
Ø
Saying “No” --- Accepting “No”
Ø
Giving Instructions --- Following Instructions
Ø
Keeping to Time Limits
Idea Exchange Skills
v
Making a Plan
v
Making Suggestions --- Responding Suggestions
v
Asking for Reasons --- Giving Reasons
v
Asking for Feedback --- Giving Feedback
v
Disagreeing Politely --- Responding to Disagreement
v
Checking Accuracy
v
Checking for understanding
v
Persuading Others
v
Compromising
v
Summarizing
PROCESSING
GROUP INTERACTIVE
Five Key Elements Steps
Ø
Reviewing
Ø
Examining the Instruments
Ø
Forming Groups and Assigning Roles
Ø
Understanding STAD and TGT
Ø
Preparing for the Activities
Steps In Teaching Collaborative Skills
v
Help Students see the need for the skills
v
Help the students understand what the skill entails
v
Provide opportunities to practice the skill in isolation from regular
class content
v
Allow time for processing the use of the collaborative skill
Cooperative Learning Technique
¢
Think – Pair – Share
¢
Paraphrase Passport
¢
RoundRobin
¢
Three – Steep interview
¢
Numbered – heads Together
¢
Talking Chips
STAD AND TGT
STAD ( Student Teams-Achievement Division )
Ø
Step 1. The teacher present a lesson via lecture, a textbook
Ø
Step 2. Heterogeneous teams of four or five students together in
preparation for individualy taking a quiz on the
material presented by the teacher.
Ø
Step 3. Student talk the quiz
Ø
Step 4. Each student`s score on the quiz.
TGT (Teams – Games – Tournament )
Ø Step 1. The teacher presents a lesson via lecture, a
textbook
Ø Step 2. Heterogeneous teams of four or five
students together in
preparation for individualy taking a quiz on the
material presented by the teacher.
Ø Step 3. Student leave their teams and go to
tournament tables.
Ø Step 4. Students take turns reading aloud and trying
to answer the questions on the cards.
Ø Step 5. Students return to their teams and calculate
the average number of points each person earned.
PROCESSING GROUP INTERACTION
Other Procedures for Processing
Group Interaction
1.
RoundTable thank you notes :
v
Each group member takes out a pieces of paper and writes their name at
the top.
v
Each person looks at the name at the top of the paper and at the bottom
of the paper, writes to thank them.
v
Remembering to fold over the paper after they write – the paper gets back
to its owner.
v
That person unfold the paper with their name at the top and reads what is
written.
1.
Resolution
This works aspecially well when groups stay together
for several sessions or even weeks.
2.
Gifts
When a group has been together for several weeks or
more and they are disbanding, one way to say farewell is to have a small
gift-giving ceremony.
ASSESSMENT IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING
Five Key Elements Steps
Ø
Choosing an Assessment Procedure
Ø
RoundRobin
Ø
Roundrobin the Second Time Around
Ø
Selecting One Procedure
Ø
Reading Other People`s Reports
ASSESSMENT IN STUDENTS WHEN COOPERATIVE LEARNING
GROUPS ARE USED
Some such approaches that have been used effectively
are discussed below
I.
A More Active Role for Students in Assessment
II.
Evaluation Based on the Whole Group`s performance
-
Group scores on a single production
-
Random selection of one member`s work
There are certain steps that teachers can take to
encourage positive views of group evaluation. For example :
a.
Make sure students experience some success and enjoyment through
cooperative learning, before introducing
group evaluation.
b.
Incorporate this basic elements of individual accountability and positive
interdependence into group experience.
c.
Monitoring interaction when students work in groups.
d.
Make sure that assessment criteria are consistent and clearly understood
by students.
III.
Evaluation Combining Individual And Group Performance
-
Dual grading of academic
performance
-
Concurrent grading of academic and collaborative skills.
IV.
The Case Against group Grades.
V.
Concluding Remarks
IS COOPERATIVE APPROPRITE IN TESTING ?
The Tests :
1.
I gave introduced collaboration of the student with instructor in
creating the test.
2.
One of the questions, involving creativity and the use of manipulatives.
3.
Exam shifted accountability of
each student to the members of a small group.
4.
Final exam had several goals.
COOPERATIVE GAMES
Ø
Step 1. Discussing if games can be cooperative.
Ø
Step 2. Playing Singapore Spy
Ø
Step 3. Creating Codes
Ø
Step 4. The Write Step
Ø
Step 5. The Pair Step
Ø
Step 6. The Square Step
Ø
Step 7. The Whole Class Tries to Crack Codes
Ø
Step 8. Sharing Ideas about Cooperative Games
TEACHER – TEACHER COOPERATIVE
Six Key Elements :
Ø
Discussing in pairs
Ø
Presenting Part of a Lecture
Ø
More Paired Discussion
Ø
Continuing with the Lecture
Ø
Continuing with Pair Work
Ø
Summing up Discussion
INFORMAL COOPERATIVE LEARNING GROUPS
v
Preparation for the Presentation
v
The First Part of the Presentation
v
Discussion of the Ideas in the Presentation
v
After the Presentation
COOPERATIVE AMONG TEACHERS
Among the possible benefits of teacher-teacher interaction are :
v
Psychological Support
v
New Ideas
v
Modeling Cooperation
v
Power
v
Reducing the Workload
v
Motivation
v
Sustaining Change
Break for Step 3 of Informal Cooperative Learning groups.
There are many ideas to keep in mind when we organize teacher-teacher
cooperation.
a.
Don`t forget people`s feeling: Friendliness, acceptance, and support are
important for our teacher groups, not just for student groups.
b.
The components of cooperative learning are just as valid in our teacher
groups as they are in student groups.
c.
Groups need to meet regularly: once a week at the minimum.
d.
Co-Planning is one item for the agenda of cooperative teacher groups.
e.
To use the same cooperative learning technique or emphasize the same
collaborative skill.
f.
To curricular integration.
g.
Parallel teaching involves teachers.
h.
Discuss issue of educational philosophy and learning teory tied to
cooperative learning.
i.
Reciprocal observation involves teachers observing each other`s classes.
j.
Co-Teaching is a related ideas.
k.
Change takes time.
PRACTICAL ISSUES IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING
Five key element :
Ø
Step 1. Listenng
Ø
Step 2. Grouping and Pairing
Ø
Step 3. Pairs Check
-
One member of each pair develops and writes down solutions for the first
problem on the list, thinking aloud as he or she does it.
-
The other member of the pair listens and watches and then provides
feedback on the other person`s solutions and
explanations behind them.
-
The observer praises the writer for good ideasand the thinking behind
them.
-
4-6 two members of each pair reverse roles for the second problem.
-
7-8 they check theit answers with each other.
Ø
Step 4. Reporting to the whole Class
Ø
Step 5. Discussing Pairs Check.
ANSWERS TO TEN QUESTIONS
ABOUT IMPLEMENTING
COOPERATIVE LEARNING
There are four steps in doing Numbered Heads
Together :
1.
Each student in a group of four gets a number : 1,2,3, or 4
2.
The teacher or a student asks a questions based on the text the class is
reading.
3.
Each group puts their heads together to come up with an answer or
answers.
4.
The teacher Calls a number from 1 to 4. The person in each group with
that number answers for their group.
This article presents a wide range of options :
a.
How big should group be ?
b.
How should groups be formed?
c.
When students are working in their groups, how can the teacher get the
class`s attention?
d.
What if a student doesn`t want to work in groups?
e.
What if some groups finish earlier than others?
f.
What if a few students are frequently absent?
g.
How long should group stay together?
h.
How should groups be ended?
i.
What percentage of the time should cooperative learning be used?
MULTIPLE – ABILITY TASKS
There are some steps :
Ø
Preparing the fragmented Circles
Ø
Discussing the Reading
Ø
Explaining the Fragmented Circles Procedure
The rules of fragmented circles are :
a.
Each person randomly receives one little triangle and five other pieces.
b.
No talking or gesturing
c.
You can give pieces to other people, but you cannot take a piece.
d.
This is not a race between group members or groups.
Ø
Putting the Pieces back Together
Ø
Explaining the Pieces
Ø
Reforming the Circle
Ø
RoundTable
Ø
Discussing fragmented Circles.
MULTIPLE
INTELLIGENCES
Types of intelligences and their educational implications
Types of intelligences :
ü
Linguistic
ü
Logical/mathematical
ü
Spatial
ü
Musical
ü
Bodily/Kinaesthetic
ü
Interpersonal
What people high in this intelligence do well :
§
Reading and writing, storytelling
§
Logical reasoning, mathematics
§
Puzzles, reading maps and charts,seeing sharpes, visualizing
§
Physical activities
§
Working with others, making friends, helping groups work well
§
Understanding oneself,metacognition, pursuing one`s own interest.
Preferred Way to Learn :
·
Saying, hearing, seeing, and writing language
·
Categorizing, working with formulas, deductive thinking
·
Drawing, designing, working with visuals
·
Songs, chants, and other materials with rhythm
·
Hand-on, role play, mime
·
Group activities, interviewing, debates
·
Activities with individual accountability, reflective activities.
COMPUTERS AND COOPERATIVE
LEARNING
There are five steps :
Ø Reading
Ø Summarizing
Ø Identifying Components of Cooperative Learning
Ø Writing the Report
Ø Whole Class Discussing
COOPERATIVE LEARNING AND
COMPUTERS
The following are two examples of how some component
of cooperative learning can be incorporated into CAI activities and materials.
Example 1 shows the design of a computer-assisted learning activity. In example
2, the design and classroom application of a piece of environmental education
courseware is explained.
Example 1
Paired Report Writing With Computers
Ø
Step 1. Forming pairs
Ø
Step 2. Report Writing in pairs
Ø
Step 3. Discussion
Example 2.
Courseware for dicision-making on environmental
issue
Ø
Step 1. Forming groups of five
Ø
Step 2. Performing the simulation in groups
Ø
Step 3. Evaluating learning outcomes
Ø
Step 4. Debriefing.
Implementing Cooperative Learning In My School
Ø
Step 1. Discussing Helping Factors
Ø
Step 2. Focused FreeWriting
Ø
Step 3. RoundRobin
Ø
Step. Organizing Factors into Categories
Ø
Step 5. Writing Categories on the Board
Ø
Step 6. Simultaneous RoundTable
Ø
Step 7. Asking for help with Hindering factors
Ø
Step 8. Whole Class Discussion
Focused Freewriting
A focused Freewriting is a writing task in which students write
continuously on a set topic for a set period of time, usually 3-20 minutes.
Why do focused freewrites ?
To prepare for a new material by eliciting students` knowledge, beliefs,
feelings, and experience on atopic.
How are focused freewrites used after they are written?
To use focused freewrites is to compare freewrites written on the same
topic at different times. Did one`s ideas change?if so, how and why? Did
everyone`s ideas change?if so, did they change in the same way?
Contructing and presenting cooperative learning lessons
Ø Step 1. Learning the Group Investigation Technique
Ø Step 2. Reviewing the Lesson plan Checklist
Ø Step 3. Forming Groups
Ø Step 4. Making and Carrying Out a Plan
Ø Step 5. Explaning and Presenting the Lesson Plan
Ø Step 6. Write-Pair-Share on Lesson Plans
Ø Step 7. Evaluating Group Investigation
COOPERATIVE LEARNING LESSON PLAN CHECKLIST
Content :
Age of students, Proficiency level, Objectives, Time, materials, Size of
groups (why)
Groups membership selected by: teacher/student/random (why). Factors used
in deciding group composition: past achievement/diligence/sex/ethnicity/interests
(why), Theory of learning, Cooperative learning technique (why), Typesbof
positive interdependence that are encouraged (How), Ways that individual
accountability is encouraged, Collaborative skill (Why is it chosen), How is it
taught, How can we prepare for it.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar